Effects of ethnicity on the relationship between vertical jump and maximal power on a cycle ergometer (2024)

  • Journal List
  • J Hum Kinet
  • v.51; 2016 Jun 1
  • PMC5260564

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Effects of ethnicity on the relationship between vertical jump and maximal power on a cycle ergometer (1)

Link to Publisher's site

J Hum Kinet. 2016 Jun 1; 51: 209–216.

Published online 2016 Jul 2. doi:10.1515/hukin-2015-0184

PMCID: PMC5260564

PMID: 28149384

Majdi Rouis,Effects of ethnicity on the relationship between vertical jump and maximal power on a cycle ergometer (2)1,2 Laure Coudrat,3 Hamdi Jaafar,1 Elvis Attiogbé,1 Henry Vandewalle,4 and Tarak Driss1

Author information Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Abstract

The aim of this study was to verify the impact of ethnicity on the maximal power-vertical jump relationship. Thirty-one healthy males, sixteen Caucasian (age: 26.3 ± 3.5 years; body height: 179.1 ± 5.5 cm; body mass: 78.1 ± 9.8 kg) and fifteen Afro-Caribbean (age: 24.4 ±2.6 years; body height: 178.9 ± 5.5 cm; body mass: 77.1 ± 10.3 kg) completed three sessions during which vertical jump height and maximal power of lower limbs were measured. The results showed that the values of vertical jump height and maximal power were higher for Afro-Caribbean participants (62.92 ± 6.7 cm and 14.70 ± 1.75 W∙kg-1) than for Caucasian ones (52.92 ± 4.4 cm and 12.75 ± 1.36 W∙kg-1). Moreover, very high reliability indices were obtained on vertical jump (e.g. 0.95 < ICC < 0.98) and maximal power performance (e.g. 0.75 < ICC < 0.97). However, multiple linear regression analysis showed that, for a given value of maximal power, the Afro-Caribbean participants jumped 8 cm higher than the Caucasians. Together, these results confirmed that ethnicity impacted the maximal power-vertical jump relationship over three sessions. In the current context of cultural diversity, the use of vertical jump performance as a predictor of muscular power should be considered with caution when dealing with populations of different ethnic origins.

Key words: power output, cycling, practice effect, reliability, ethnicity

Introduction

Vertical jump tests are widely used as effective field evaluations of maximal power, a key indicator of the anaerobic metabolism. Indeed, several studies have demonstrated that maximal power of the lower limbs measured on a cycle ergometer (Pmax) is positively correlated with vertical jump height (VJ). This shows that the greater the maximal power of the lower limbs, the greater the vertical jump height (Driss et al., 1998; Vandewalle et al., 1987).

However, a number of studies have highlighted that the Pmax-VJ relationship is impacted by ethnicity (Rouis et al., 2015). For example, for a given value of VJ, Pmax of West African volleyball players was lower than Pmax of their Caucasian counterparts. Thus, the prediction of maximal power from vertical jump height appears to be biased when various ethnic groups are considered. This result is even more important today in the context of cultural diversity.

Earlier extensive studies in exercise physiology showed that ethnicity had an impact on power performance in jumping. All of these studies found that Afro-Carribean males (Rouis et al., 2015; Zajac et al., 2000), young boys (Babel et al., 2005; Ben Ayed et al., 2011; Ghesquière and Eeckels, 1984; Malina, 1988), and adolescents (Burfoot, 1992) jumped higher than their white counterparts. In addition, a greater ability of Afro-Carribean participants has been extended more generally to locomotor skills in preschool children, for activities such as running, hopping, leaping or sliding (Goodway et al., 2010). These results have been explained mainly by constitutional differences between ethnic populations, such as differences in terms of body composition (Wagner and Heyward, 2007), muscle-tendon properties (McCarthy et al., 2006) and muscle fiber types (Bouchard et al., 1986).

However, little is known of the impact of ethnicity on cycling performance, with divergent results found in exercise physiology. While some studies showed that Pmax of Afro-Carribean participants was lower than that of their Caucasian counterparts (Ben Ayed et al., 2011; Rouis et al., 2015), others found that Pmax was similar in both ethnic groups (Burfoot, 1992) or higher for Caucasian compared with Afro-Carribean participants (Zajac et al., 2000). Since cycling is a complex cyclical activity requiring a specific coordination of the lower limb muscles, few authors have suggested that the contrasting results obtained on Pmax performance might stem from a practice effect (Ben Ayed et al., 2011; Vandewalle et al., 1987). Nevertheless, this hypothesis has not yet been truly tested.

The present study served as a preliminary stage to validate this assumption. In an earlier reliability study, the effect of practice on power performance was observed beginning with the second session of a test (Hopkins et al., 2001). Therefore, it might be assumed that three sessions of a test should be sufficient to observe an improvement in Pmax and VJ for Afro-Caribbean and Caucasian participants, respectively. If a practice effect is observed, then the impact of ethnicity on the Pmax-VJ relationship will tend to disappear with an increase in the number of sessions. If no practice effect is observed, then the impact of ethnicity on the Pmax-VJ relationship will persist throughout the sessions and will reinforce the assumption that predicting maximal power from vertical jump height should be considered with caution when dealing with different ethnic groups.

Material and Methods

Participants

Thirty-one healthy and active men (sixteen Caucasian and fifteen Afro-Caribbean), involved in recreational sports activities four to five hours per week (jogging, soccer), volunteered for this study. Participants were matched for age, body height and mass (Table 1). None of the participants was a cyclist or a jumper. Moreover, 73% of the Caucasian participants, but only 27% of the Afro-Caribbean participants reported owning a bicycle. Each participant signed an informed consent form prior to the experimental procedures. The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Nanterre University. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Table 1

Physical characteristics between Afro-Caribbean and Caucasian groups. Values are means ± SD

Age (year)Body height (cm)Body mass (kg)
Afro-Caribbean (n=15)24.4 ± 2.06178.9 ± 5.5477.01 ± 10.34
Caucasian (n=16)26.3 ± 3.53179.1 ± 5.5578.06 ± 9.84
pNSNSNS

Open in a separate window

Procedures

Since a practice effect in power tests can be observed beginning with the second session of a test (Hopkins et al., 2001), the participants of the present study completed three sessions (two days apart). Each session consisted of a vertical jump test followed by a force-velocity test, separated by a passive recovery period of 15 minutes.

Vertical jump test

A maximal countermovement vertical jump (VJ) was performed according to the procedure and the device described by Vandewalle et al. (1987). The VJ corresponded to the distance between the participant's body height and the level reached by his head at the peak of the jump. The participants performed the vertical jump using a countermovement of the trunk, legs and arms, but without a run. They performed two or three jumps with a 10 to 15 s recovery period between the trials. Thereafter, the participants were given 2 min to rest before jumping again until reaching their maximal performance. Approximately ten jumps were performed and the highest result was recorded for further analysis.

Force-velocity test

The force-velocity test was performed according to the protocol proposed by Vandewalle et al. (1987). This test consisted of repetitive short maximal sprints (6 s each) against different braking forces. The test began with a breaking force equal to 19.6 N. This braking force was increased by 19.6 N after 5 min of recovery. The same exercise was performed again until the participants were unable to reach a peak velocity greater than 100 rpm. The participants generally performed from 6 to 8 short all-out sprints. According to Vandewalle et al. (1987), maximal power of lower limbs (Pmax) was determined from the linear force-velocity relationship and was equal to:

Pmax =0.5V0×0.5F0 =0.25V0F0

where V0 is assumed to be an estimate of maximal velocity at zero braking force and F0 is assumed to be the braking force corresponding to zero velocity (Vandewalle et al., 1987).

Statistical analyses

Analyses were performed using Sigma-stat software (Jandel, France). Data distribution normality was confirmed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance test.

For each session, the effect of ethnicity on the Pmax-VJ relationship was studied by multiple linear regression analysis between the dependent variable (VJ) and the independent variable (Pmax) plus a dummy variable E corresponding to ethnicity (E = 1 for Afro-Caribbean and E = 0 for Caucasian) according to the following model:

where ∊ is the error.

The effect of practice on the VJ and Pmax was analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA): session (session 1, session 2, session 3) and ethnic group (Caucasian, Afro-Caribbean), with repeated measures on the first factor.

Additionally, the practice effect was studied from reliability indices using the test-retest correlation coefficient (r), the standard error of estimation (SEE) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between each session.

For all analyses, the level of significance was set at p < .05.

Results

Table 2 presents summary data for all of the dependent variables.

Table 2

Trends of vertical jump performance (VJ) and maximal power (Pmax) during the three sessions and according to the Caucasian and Afro-Caribbean groups. Values are means ± SD

Session 1Session 2Session 3
Caucasian52.92 ± 4.5252.79 ± 4.2353.14 ± 4.38
VJ (cm)Afro-Caribbean62.33 ± 6.4162.93 ± 6.5962.80 ± 7.12
p*********
Pmax (W·kg-1)Caucasian12.58 ± 1.5512.61 ± 1.1813.05 ± 1.35
Afro-Caribbean14.61 ± 1.8914.66 ± 1.6314.83 ± 1.72
p*******

Open in a separate window

p: level of significance for the difference between groups (Caucasian versus Afro-Caribbean)

*: p < .05.

**p < .01

***p < .001

Results of multiple regressions

For each session, multiple regression analysis revealed that the relationships between VJ, Pmax and ethnicity were significant (p < .001), with the correlation coefficient (r) ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 (Figure 1). The VJ values were also significantly correlated with both Pmax and ethnicity (p < .001).

Open in a separate window

Figure 1

Relationships between maximal power (Pmax) and vertical jump (VJ) for both ethnic groups. A) session 1, B) session 2 and C) session 3. Multiple regression equations for Afro-Caribbeans (1, continuous line, black circles) and Caucasians (2, dashed line, empty circles).

Moreover, the multiple regression equations showed that, for the same Pmax, the Afro-Caribbean group jumped 8 cm higher on average than the Caucasian group, regardless of the session.

Vertical jump performance

The two-way ANOVA performed on vertical jump performance revealed a main effect of ethnicity (F1,29 = 16,13, p < .001). The value of the vertical jump height of the Afro-Caribbean group (62.92 ± 6.7 cm) was higher than that of the Caucasian group (52.95 ± 4.4 cm). However, there was no session effect and no interaction between the session and ethnicity (p > .05).

The results of the test-retest correlation coefficients and the SEE and ICC values showed high reliability for the vertical jump height for both groups (i.e. r > 0.94, ICC ≥ 0.95, SEE < 3.98%) (Figure 2).

Open in a separate window

Figure 2

Reliability indices for maximal power (Pmax) and vertical jump (VJ) between sessions in Afro-Caribbean (1, black circles) and Caucasian (2, empty circles) groups. r: test-retest correlation coefficient, SEE: standard error of estimation, ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient. The dashed line represents the identity line.

Maximal power of lower limbs

The two-way ANOVA showed only a significant main effect of ethnicity for Pmax (F1,29 = 13.04, p < .001). The results indicated that the value of Pmax for the Afro-Caribbean group (14.70 ± 1.75 W∙kg–1) was greater than that of the Caucasian group (12.75 ± 1.36 W∙kg–1). However, no session effect and no interaction between the session and ethnicity were found (p > .05).

All reliability indices showed high reliability for Pmax for both groups (i.e. r > 0.80, ICC ≥ 0.78, SEE ≤ 6.32%) (Figure 2).

Discussion

Based on previous studies (Rouis et al., 2015), the results of the present study indicated that ethnicity significantly impacted the Pmax-VJ relationship. Indeed, the results of the multiple linear regression analysis showed that, for a given value of Pmax, the Afro-Caribbean participants jumped on average 8 cm higher than the Caucasians. However, the results of the present study showed no practice effect. Indeed, the results of the ANOVA showed neither a session effect nor an interaction between the session and ethnicity in all dependent variables (i.e. Pmax and VJ). Furthermore, the reliability indices confirmed the results of the ANOVA.

Test-retest correlation coefficients, standard errors of estimation and intraclass correlation coefficients showed very high reliability between each session for both the Pmax and VJ performances and for both ethnic groups. Combined, these results demonstrated that neither the Caucasian nor Afro-Caribbean participants improved their performance in jumping and cycling, respectively.

Numerous studies in the field of physiology have highlighted morphological (Malina, 1988; Nelson et al., 1995), muscular (Ama et al., 1986), enzymatic (Saltin et al., 1995) and mechanical (f*ckashiro et al., 2002) differences between Afro-Caribbean and Caucasian populations. Specifically, it has been demonstrated that Afro-Caribbean sedentary men and athletes have a higher percentage of fast twitch fibers and muscle stiffness than their Caucasian counterparts (Ama et al., 1986; f*ckashiro et al., 2002). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that vertical jump height and maximal power are positively correlated with the percentage of fast fibres (Glenmark et al., 1994) and muscle-tendon stiffness (Driss et al., 2012; f*ckashiro et al., 2002).

Recently, some authors reported specific anatomical properties such as greater tendon length of the lower limbs in Afro-Caribbean subjects compared to Caucasian subjects (Kunimasa et al., 2014; Sano et al., 2013). Indeed, the greater tendon length may positively contribute to the output from the muscle tendon complex in a stretch shortening cycle during jumping with prestretch and this feature could be responsible for better vertical jump performance in the Afro-Caribbean participants.

Therefore, although the present study did not focus on these parameters, it could be assumed that better jumping and cycling performances observed in the Afro-Caribbean group compared with the Caucasian one might stem from these constitutional differences.

However, it is interesting to note that whereas all studies showed higher vertical jump performance for Afro-Caribbean participants compared with Caucasians (Ben Ayed et al., 2011; Burfoot, 1992; Zajac et al., 2000), divergent results were obtained for maximal power. Considering Pmax, the results of the present study are consistent with those obtained in the study of Zajac et al. (2000). In this latter study, the Afro-Caribbean group’s performance in Pmax was 6.1% higher than that of the Caucasian group. In contrast, in the studies of Ben Ayed et al. (2011) and Rouis et al. (2015), Pmax of Afro-Caribbean participants was lower than that of their Caucasian counterparts. Moreover, the study of Burfoot (1992) found no ethnic difference in Pmax. These divergent results concerning the impact of ethnicity on Pmax might be interpreted as arising from a difference in the practice of cycling. However, the results obtained in the present study did not confirm this assumption as no effect of practice was observed over three sessions.

Moreover, a few studies from social science have demonstrated that cycling is an activity of white men (Steinbach et al., 2011) and that cycling barriers and opportunities varied according to ethnicity (Christie et al., 2011; Kidder, 2005). For example, young Africans in disadvantaged areas in England were more likely to report not owning or never having ridden a bicycle, compared with other ethnic groups such as whites (Christie et al., 2011). Thus, it is reasonable to postulate that the impact of ethnicity on the Pmax-VJ relationship might be explained in part by a socio-cultural factor, i.e. a practice effect.

A primary limitation of the present study relates to the number of sessions based on which a practice effect was measured. Indeed, it could be assumed that three sessions were not sufficient to detect a performance improvement in Pmax and/or the VJ. Further research is needed to understand the role of practice of cycling in the Pmax-VJ relationship on the basis of a larger-scale study integrating a greater number of sessions.

Moreover, the present study focused only on mechanical indices. It would be interesting to go further and focus on the inter-muscle coordination pattern, which is of great importance in cycling performance.

In conclusion, the results of the present study showed that, for a given value of Pmax, the Afro-Caribbean participants jumped higher than the Caucasians. This was the case regardless of the session. Furthermore, VJ and Pmax performances were similar from session 1 to session 3 and high reliability indices were found on these parameters between sessions and for both ethnic groups. Combined, these results suggested that the impact of ethnicity on the Pmax-VJ relationship was not influenced by a practice effect over three sessions. These findings call for caution when using vertical jump tests as an accuracy predictor of Pmax when different ethnic groups are considered. Further studies with more subjects and a longer practice period are required for more conclusive results.

Notes

Authors submitted their contribution to the article to the editorial board.

Accepted for printing in the Journal of Human Kinetics vol. 51/2016 in June 2016.

References

  • Ama PF, Simoneau JA, Boulay MR, Serresse O, Theriaut G, Bouchard C. Skeletal muscle characteristics in sedentary black and Caucasians males. J Appl Physiol. 1986;61:1758–1761. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Babel K, Hertogh C, Hue O. Influence of ethnic origin on predictive parameters of performance in sprint running in prepubertal boys. Int J Sports Med. 2005;26:1–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ben Ayed K, Latiri I, Doré E, Tabka Z. Leg muscle power in 12-year-old black and white Tunisian football players. Res Sports Med. 2011;19:103–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Burfoot A. White men can’t run. Runner’s World. 1992:89–95. [Google Scholar]
  • Bouchard C, Simoneau JA, Lortie G, Boulay MR, Marcotte M, Thibault MC. Genetic effects in human skeletal muscle fiber type distribution and enzyme activities. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1986;64:1245–1251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Christie N, Kimberlee R, Towner E, Rodgers S, Ward H, Sleney J, Lyons R. Children aged 9–14 living in disadvantaged areas in England: Opportunities and barriers for cycling. J Transport Geography. 2011;19:943–949. [Google Scholar]
  • Driss T, Lambertz D, Rouis M, Vandewalle H. Influence of musculo-tendinous stiffness of the plantar ankle flexor muscles upon maximal power output on a cycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:3721–3728. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Driss T, Vandewalle H, Monod H. Maximal power and force-velocity relationships during cycling and cranking exercises in volleyball players. Correlation with the vertical jump test. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1998;38:286–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • f*ckashiro S, Abe T, Shibayama A, Brechue WF. Comparison of viscoelastic characteristics in triceps surae between black and white athletes. Acta Physiol Scand. 2002;175:183–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ghesquière J, Eeckels R. Ilmarinen J, Välimäki I. Children and Sport. Paediatric work physiology. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1984. Health, physical development, and fitness of primary school children in Kinshasa; pp. 20–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Glenmark B, Hedberg G, Kaijser L, Jansson E. Muscle strength from adolescence to adulthood -relationship to muscle fibre types. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1994;68:9–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Goodway JD, Robinson LE, Crowe H. Gender differences in fundamental motor skill development in disadvantaged preschoolers from two geographical regions. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2010;81:17–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hopkins WG, Schabort EJ, Hawley JA. Reliability of power in physical performance tests. Sports Med. 2001;31:211–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kidder J. Style and action: a decoding of bike messenger symbols. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2005;34:344–367. [Google Scholar]
  • Kunimasa Y, Sano K, Oda T, Nicol C, Komi PV, Locatelli E, Ito A, Ishikawa M. Specific muscletendon architecture in elite Kenyan distance runners. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24:e269–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Malina RM. Racial/ethnic variation in the motor development and performance of American children. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1988;13:136–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McCarthy JP, Hunter GR, Larson-Meyer DE, Bamman MM, Landers KA, Newcomer BR. Ethnic differences in triceps surae muscle-tendon complex and walking economy. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20:511–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nelson DA, Jacobsen G, Barondess DA, Parfitt AM. Ethnic differences in regional bone density, hip axislength, and lifestyle variables among healthy black and white men. J Bone Miner Res. 1995;10:782–787. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rouis M, Attiogbé E, Vandewalle H, Jaafar H, Noakes TD, Driss T. Relationship between vertical jump and maximal power output of legs and arms: effects of ethnicity and sport. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25:e197–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Saltin B, Kim CK, Terrados N, Larsen H, Svedenhag J, Rolf CJ. Morphology, enzyme activities and buffer capacity in leg muscles of Kenyan and Scandinavian runners. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1995;5:222–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sano K, Ishikawa M, Nobue A, Danno Y, Akiyama M, Oda T, Ito A, Hoffrén M, Nicol C, Locatelli E, Komi PV. Muscle-tendon interaction and EMG profiles of world class endurance runners during hopping. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013;113:1395–403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Steinbach R, Green J, Datta J, Edwards P. Cycling and the city: A case study of how gendered, ethnic and class identities can shape healthy transport choices. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:1123–1130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vandewalle H, Pérès G, Heller J, Panel J, Monod H. Force-velocity relationship and maximal power on a cycle ergometer-correlation with a vertical jump. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1987;56:650–656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wagner DR, Heyward VH. Measures of body composition in blacks and whites: a comparative review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;71:1392–1402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zajac A, Waskiewicz Z, Litkowycz R. Motor fitness aerobic and anaerobic power and physique in elite black and white athletes. J Hum Kinet. 2000;4:85–9. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Human Kinetics are provided here courtesy of Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Poland

Effects of ethnicity on the relationship between vertical jump and maximal power on a cycle ergometer (2024)

FAQs

Effects of ethnicity on the relationship between vertical jump and maximal power on a cycle ergometer? ›

The results showed that the values of vertical jump height and maximal power were higher for Afro-Caribbean participants (62.92 ± 6.7 cm and 14.70 ± 1.75 W∙kg-1) than for Caucasian ones (52.92 ± 4.4 cm and 12.75 ± 1.36 W∙kg-1).

How do genetics affect vertical jump? ›

The truth is your genetics do dictate your potential to jump. Muscle fiber type and CNS efficiency are just two examples of traits that will ultimately determine how high you can jump, both of which are nearly impossible to see just by looking at someone. Not everyone can have a 30 inch vertical, much less a 40 or 50.

What affects vertical jump performance? ›

Several factors such as age, sex, physical activity, training experience and sport-specific training may affect the development of vertical jumping ability during growth and development [6, 9–10, 13, 24].

What influences vertical jump? ›

When it comes to the vertical jump, force is the maximum amount of strength that someone has, and velocity is the maximum amount of speed someone has. If you increase your strength and your velocity (in ratio to your body weight), then your vertical jump will improve.

What is the correlation between height and vertical jump? ›

Furthermore, Markovic [19] investigated the correlation between body mass and vertical jump height and showed that body mass was independent of jump height. Davis et al. [18] observed no significant correlation between body height and vertical jump.

Does race affect vertical jump? ›

Vertical jump performance

The value of the vertical jump height of the Afro-Caribbean group (62.92 ± 6.7 cm) was higher than that of the Caucasian group (52.95 ± 4.4 cm).

Does genetics play a role in vertical? ›

This showed that genetic factors explained most of the variance in vertical jump (62 %; 95 % CI 47–77 %, N = 874), handgrip strength (63 %; 95 % CI 47–73 %, N = 4516) and flexibility (50 %; 95 % CI 38–61 %, N = 1130) in children and young adults.

What is the main contributor to vertical jump capability? ›

It is concluded that the muscle strength characteristics of the lower limb joints are the main determinant of vertical jump performance with technique playing a smaller role.

Is there a correlation between vertical jump and speed? ›

vertical jump and sprinting are related as both involve the explosive use of the leg muscles. A higher vertical jump can indicate a stronger ability to generate force and power in the legs, which can translate to improved sprinting speed.

How does vertical jump improve power? ›

In fact, the vertical jump itself is a plyometric movement. Improvements in all vertical jumps typically range between 4 – 8 % following plyometric training. Improvements are likely due to increased muscular power and enhanced coordination following plyometric training (10).

Why can't girls jump as high as boys? ›

Some studies also suggest that males have a higher ratio of fast-twitch muscle fibers, along with a physiology that's more efficient at recruiting the muscles needed to jump.

How does age affect vertical jump? ›

Vertical jumping power declines with advancing age, which is theoretically explicable by loss of muscle mass and increases in body fat.

What is the world's highest vertical jump? ›

What is the highest vertical jump recorded? The world record holder for the vertical jump is held by Michael Wilson of the Globetrotters, who has a 55" leap (he also once dunked on a 12-foot hoop, which is also a record).

What is the relationship between jump height and power? ›

The strength of the correlation is artificially inflated by the near-perfect correlation between jump height and the velocity at peak power (ρH,V). Jump height should also be strongly correlated with the average power during the upward propulsion phase.

Do taller people have higher verticals? ›

Vertical jump height is affected by many anthropometric measures such as weight, stature, and lower limb length (Fattahi et al., 2012; Aouadi et al., 2012). Taller persons, or persons with a greater stature, tend to have a greater vertical jump height.

What are the determinants of jump height? ›

Ultimately, the jumping height is detcrminyd by the vertical velocity of the centre of gravity at take-off. This velocity depends on the mass of the subject and the linear impulse which is the result of the upward acceleration of the different body segments involved in the jumping action.

What genetics are good for jumping? ›

The ACTN3 gene basically enhances the expression of high velocity fast twitch IIX fibers, important when jumping, sprinting, or doing anything else requiring force at high velocity. People with the RR phenotype have 2 copies of the ACTN3, thus full ACTN3 expression.

Is vertical hereditary? ›

Genetics are certainly a factor with vertical jump and athleticism. But that doesn't mean you can't improve your ability and reach your genetic potential through training. There's a few metrics you can check to see how close you are to reaching your genetic potential through training.

Does genetics play a role in athleticism? ›

Athletic performance is a complex trait that is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Many physical traits help determine an individual's athletic ability, primarily the strength of muscles used for movement (skeletal muscles ) and the predominant type of fibers that compose them.

What is a jumping gene in genetics? ›

Transposable elements (TEs), also known as "jumping genes" or transposons, are sequences of DNA that move (or jump) from one location in the genome to another.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Dr. Pierre Goyette

Last Updated:

Views: 5823

Rating: 5 / 5 (50 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Dr. Pierre Goyette

Birthday: 1998-01-29

Address: Apt. 611 3357 Yong Plain, West Audra, IL 70053

Phone: +5819954278378

Job: Construction Director

Hobby: Embroidery, Creative writing, Shopping, Driving, Stand-up comedy, Coffee roasting, Scrapbooking

Introduction: My name is Dr. Pierre Goyette, I am a enchanting, powerful, jolly, rich, graceful, colorful, zany person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.